The Uriscreen test was not better than standard urinalysis and dipstick tests for detecting urinary tract infection in children

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Cite this

@article{aaf3208fea484bddb575cfa9f393265f,

title = "The Uriscreen test was not better than standard urinalysis and dipstick tests for detecting urinary tract infection in children",

author = "Wigton, {R. S.}",

year = "2000",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1136/ebm.5.4.126",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "5",

journal = "Evidence-Based Medicine",

issn = "1356-5524",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Uriscreen test was not better than standard urinalysis and dipstick tests for detecting urinary tract infection in children

AU - Wigton, R. S.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033841857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033841857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/ebm.5.4.126

DO - 10.1136/ebm.5.4.126

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:0033841857

VL - 5

JO - Evidence-Based Medicine

JF - Evidence-Based Medicine

SN - 1356-5524

IS - 4

ER -