TY - JOUR
T1 - The volume changes of unfolding of dsDNA
AU - Makhatadze, George I.
AU - Chen, Calvin R.
AU - Khutsishvili, Irine
AU - Marky, Luis A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by grants CHEM / CLP-1803045 (to G.I.M.) and MCB-1912587 (to L.A.M.) from the US National Science Foundation (NSF). This work used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE) comet (SDSC) and stampede2 (TACC) using allocation TG-MCB140107 , which is supported by the US National Science Foundation grant number ACI-1548562 . Additional computational resources were provided by the Center for Computational Innovations at RPI .
Funding Information:
This work was supported by grants CHEM/CLP-1803045 (to G.I.M.) and MCB-1912587 (to L.A.M.) from the US National Science Foundation (NSF). This work used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE) comet (SDSC) and stampede2 (TACC) using allocation TG-MCB140107, which is supported by the US National Science Foundation grant number ACI-1548562. Additional computational resources were provided by the Center for Computational Innovations at RPI. The authors declare no competing interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Biophysical Society
PY - 2022/12/20
Y1 - 2022/12/20
N2 - High hydrostatic pressure can have profound effects on the stability of biomacromolecules. The magnitude and direction (stabilizing or destabilizing) of this effect is defined by the volume changes in the system, ΔV. Positive volume changes will stabilize the starting native state, whereas negative volume changes will lead to the stabilization of the final unfolded state. For the DNA double helix, experimental data suggested that when the thermostability of dsDNA is below 50°C, increase in hydrostatic pressure will lead to destabilization; i.e., helix-to-coil transition has negative ΔV. In contrast, the dsDNA sequences with the thermostability above 50°C showed positive ΔV values and were stabilized by hydrostatic pressure. In order to get insight into this switch in the response of dsDNA to hydrostatic pressure as a function of temperature, first we further validated this trend using experimental measurements of ΔV for 10 different dsDNA sequences using pressure perturbation calorimetry. We also developed a computational protocol to calculate the expected volume changes of dsDNA unfolding, which was benchmarked against the experimental set of 50 ΔV values that included, in addition to our data, the values from the literature. Computation predicts well the experimental values of ΔV. Such agreement between computation and experiment lends credibility to the computation protocol and provides molecular level rational for the observed temperature dependence of ΔV that can be traced to the hydration. Difference in the ΔV value for A/T versus G/C basepairs is also discussed.
AB - High hydrostatic pressure can have profound effects on the stability of biomacromolecules. The magnitude and direction (stabilizing or destabilizing) of this effect is defined by the volume changes in the system, ΔV. Positive volume changes will stabilize the starting native state, whereas negative volume changes will lead to the stabilization of the final unfolded state. For the DNA double helix, experimental data suggested that when the thermostability of dsDNA is below 50°C, increase in hydrostatic pressure will lead to destabilization; i.e., helix-to-coil transition has negative ΔV. In contrast, the dsDNA sequences with the thermostability above 50°C showed positive ΔV values and were stabilized by hydrostatic pressure. In order to get insight into this switch in the response of dsDNA to hydrostatic pressure as a function of temperature, first we further validated this trend using experimental measurements of ΔV for 10 different dsDNA sequences using pressure perturbation calorimetry. We also developed a computational protocol to calculate the expected volume changes of dsDNA unfolding, which was benchmarked against the experimental set of 50 ΔV values that included, in addition to our data, the values from the literature. Computation predicts well the experimental values of ΔV. Such agreement between computation and experiment lends credibility to the computation protocol and provides molecular level rational for the observed temperature dependence of ΔV that can be traced to the hydration. Difference in the ΔV value for A/T versus G/C basepairs is also discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136292902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85136292902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.08.005
DO - 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.08.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 35962547
AN - SCOPUS:85136292902
VL - 121
SP - 4892
EP - 4899
JO - Biophysical Journal
JF - Biophysical Journal
SN - 0006-3495
IS - 24
ER -