Urban ethnography and research integrity: Empirical and theoretical dimensions

James F. Short, Lorine A. Hughes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Problems of data reliability and validity continue to plague the social and behavioral sciences. Enhanced reliability of quantitative data has been achieved by such means as greater attention to instrument construction and testing, improvements in survey technology and sampling of targeted populations, and careful operationalization of theoretical ideas. The integrity of much quantitative research is compromised, however, when quantitative measures lack validity, especially when properties of groups and other collectivities are measured by responses obtained from individuals. Ethnographic and other forms of observational data offer important correctives to this problem. We illustrate the interplay of quantitative and qualitative research methods by examining studies extending ideas from Elijah Anderson's Code of the Street to 'neighborhood codes of violence', the violence-avoiding function of street codes, and special problems of evaluation research as they apply to programs designed to control street gangs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-415
Number of pages19
JournalEthnography
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009

Keywords

  • Evaluation research
  • Individual versus group behavior
  • Quantitative/qualitative data
  • Research methods
  • Street codes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Urban ethnography and research integrity: Empirical and theoretical dimensions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this