TY - JOUR
T1 - U.S. agricultural productivity
T2 - A review of USDA economic research service methods
AU - Richard Shumway, C.
AU - Fraumeni, Barbara M.
AU - Fulginiti, Lilyan E.
AU - Samuels, Jon D.
AU - Stefanou, Spiro E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
PY - 2015/8/12
Y1 - 2015/8/12
N2 - The USDA Economic Research Service has emerged as an acknowledged intellectual leader in the construction and integration of national and state-level productivity accounts in agriculture. The national and state-level ERS productivity measures are widely referred to and used, and international sectoral comparisons rely on the ERS production accounts for foundation methodology in constructing agricultural productivity accounts in other countries. This leadership role has endured for many decades and accelerated in response to the AAEA-USDA Task Force review of the agricultural productivity accounts (Gardner et al. 1980). It is against this backdrop of vigorous intellectual leadership that an external review committee has examined the data sources, methodology, ongoing research, documentation, and reporting of the ERS agricultural productivity accounts. Our recommendations are many and some are substantial. Two of the most important recommendations address overarching concerns of documentation and efficiency, two more consider website communication of methods and data, and four focus on the renewal and construction of the state-level accounts.
AB - The USDA Economic Research Service has emerged as an acknowledged intellectual leader in the construction and integration of national and state-level productivity accounts in agriculture. The national and state-level ERS productivity measures are widely referred to and used, and international sectoral comparisons rely on the ERS production accounts for foundation methodology in constructing agricultural productivity accounts in other countries. This leadership role has endured for many decades and accelerated in response to the AAEA-USDA Task Force review of the agricultural productivity accounts (Gardner et al. 1980). It is against this backdrop of vigorous intellectual leadership that an external review committee has examined the data sources, methodology, ongoing research, documentation, and reporting of the ERS agricultural productivity accounts. Our recommendations are many and some are substantial. Two of the most important recommendations address overarching concerns of documentation and efficiency, two more consider website communication of methods and data, and four focus on the renewal and construction of the state-level accounts.
KW - Agricultural productivity
KW - Economic research service
KW - Program review
KW - Total factor productivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959923057&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959923057&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/aepp/ppv032
DO - 10.1093/aepp/ppv032
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84959923057
SN - 2040-5790
VL - 38
SP - 1
EP - 29
JO - Review of Agricultural Economics
JF - Review of Agricultural Economics
IS - 1
M1 - ppv032
ER -