TY - JOUR
T1 - Utilized coefficient of friction during walking
T2 - Static estimates exceed measured values
AU - Powers, Christopher M.
AU - Burnfield, Judith M.
AU - Lim, Phil
AU - Brault, John M.
AU - Flynn, James E.
PY - 2002/11
Y1 - 2002/11
N2 - This study compared utilized coefficient of friction (COF) measured during nonslip pedestrian gait to estimated utilized COF values calculated using anthropometric (i.e., leg length) and stride characteristic data (i.e., impact angle, step length). Twenty healthy adults walked at slow, medium, and fast speeds with kinematic and kinetic data recorded simultaneously. Estimated and measured impact angle varied with walking speed, with greater angles evident with faster speeds (p < 0.001 andp < 0.05, respectively). The estimated impact angle was greater than the measured impact angle (p < 0.05). Estimated and measured peak utilized COF values varied with walking speed, with higher utilized COF values evident with faster speeds (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Estimated utilized COF values were 86, 118, and 131% greater than measured peak utilized COF values for slow, medium, and fast speeds, respectively (p < 0.001). Higher estimated utilized COF values varied moderately with increased measured peak utilized COF values (r = 0.522; p < 0.001). These data suggest that impact angle and step length alone cannot be used to accurately assess the utilized COF on level walking surfaces.
AB - This study compared utilized coefficient of friction (COF) measured during nonslip pedestrian gait to estimated utilized COF values calculated using anthropometric (i.e., leg length) and stride characteristic data (i.e., impact angle, step length). Twenty healthy adults walked at slow, medium, and fast speeds with kinematic and kinetic data recorded simultaneously. Estimated and measured impact angle varied with walking speed, with greater angles evident with faster speeds (p < 0.001 andp < 0.05, respectively). The estimated impact angle was greater than the measured impact angle (p < 0.05). Estimated and measured peak utilized COF values varied with walking speed, with higher utilized COF values evident with faster speeds (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Estimated utilized COF values were 86, 118, and 131% greater than measured peak utilized COF values for slow, medium, and fast speeds, respectively (p < 0.001). Higher estimated utilized COF values varied moderately with increased measured peak utilized COF values (r = 0.522; p < 0.001). These data suggest that impact angle and step length alone cannot be used to accurately assess the utilized COF on level walking surfaces.
KW - Forensic science
KW - Friction threshold
KW - Gait
KW - Slip resistance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036847403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036847403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1520/jfs15565j
DO - 10.1520/jfs15565j
M3 - Article
C2 - 12455654
AN - SCOPUS:0036847403
SN - 0022-1198
VL - 47
SP - 1303
EP - 1308
JO - Journal of Forensic Sciences
JF - Journal of Forensic Sciences
IS - 6
ER -