Validity of bioelectrical impedance equations for estimating fat-free weight in high school female gymnasts

Joan M. Eckerson; Tammy K. Evetovich; Jeffrey R. Stout; Terry J. Housh; Glen O. Johnson; Dona J. Housh; Kyle T. Ebersole; Douglas B. Smith

doi:10.1097/00005768-199707000-00017

Validity of bioelectrical impedance equations for estimating fat-free weight in high school female gymnasts

Joan M. Eckerson, Tammy K. Evetovich, Jeffrey R. Stout, Terry J. Housh, Glen O. Johnson, Dona J. Housh, Kyle T. Ebersole, Douglas B. Smith

Oral Biology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present study examined the validity of bioelectrical impedance (BIA) equations for estimating fat-free weight (FFW) in female gymnasts by comparing the values to those obtained from underwater weighing (UWW). Ninety-seven female Caucasian high school gymnasts (X age ± SD = 15.7 ± 1.1 yr) participated in the study. FFW from UWW was calculated from percent fat using the revised formula of Brozek et al. (5 (X FFW ± SD = 43.8 ± 4.5 kg) and the age-specific constants of Lohman (28) (X FFW ± SD = 44.8 ± 4.6 kg). Cross-validation analyses included examination of the constant error (CE), SEE, r, and total error (TE). The results indicated similar trends between equations when based on either the Brozek or Lohman conversions; however, the CE, SEE, and TE values were consistently lower for the majority of the equations using the revised formula of Brozek et al. (5). Based upon the results of the cross-validation analyses, the equation of Houtkooper et al. (22) and the interlaboratory equations of Van Loan et al. (50) and Lohman (29), which resulted in identical TE values of 2.4 kg are recommended for use with young high school gymnasts.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	962-968
Number of pages	7
Journal	Medicine and science in sports and exercise
Volume	29
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199707000-00017
State	Published - Jul 1997

Keywords

Bioelectrical impedance analysis
Body composition
Cross-validation
Underwater weighing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Access to Document

10.1097/00005768-199707000-00017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of bioelectrical impedance equations for estimating fat-free weight in high school female gymnasts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Eckerson, J. M., Evetovich, T. K., Stout, J. R., Housh, T. J., Johnson, G. O., Housh, D. J., Ebersole, K. T., & Smith, D. B. (1997). Validity of bioelectrical impedance equations for estimating fat-free weight in high school female gymnasts. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 29(7), 962-968. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199707000-00017

Validity of bioelectrical impedance equations for estimating fat-free weight in high school female gymnasts. / Eckerson, Joan M.; Evetovich, Tammy K.; Stout, Jeffrey R.; Housh, Terry J.; Johnson, Glen O.; Housh, Dona J.; Ebersole, Kyle T.; Smith, Douglas B.

In: Medicine and science in sports and exercise, Vol. 29, No. 7, 07.1997, p. 962-968.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

@article{6056e2a489d84a949b017f2179bac16d,

title = "Validity of bioelectrical impedance equations for estimating fat-free weight in high school female gymnasts",

abstract = "The present study examined the validity of bioelectrical impedance (BIA) equations for estimating fat-free weight (FFW) in female gymnasts by comparing the values to those obtained from underwater weighing (UWW). Ninety-seven female Caucasian high school gymnasts (X age ± SD = 15.7 ± 1.1 yr) participated in the study. FFW from UWW was calculated from percent fat using the revised formula of Brozek et al. (5 (X FFW ± SD = 43.8 ± 4.5 kg) and the age-specific constants of Lohman (28) (X FFW ± SD = 44.8 ± 4.6 kg). Cross-validation analyses included examination of the constant error (CE), SEE, r, and total error (TE). The results indicated similar trends between equations when based on either the Brozek or Lohman conversions; however, the CE, SEE, and TE values were consistently lower for the majority of the equations using the revised formula of Brozek et al. (5). Based upon the results of the cross-validation analyses, the equation of Houtkooper et al. (22) and the interlaboratory equations of Van Loan et al. (50) and Lohman (29), which resulted in identical TE values of 2.4 kg are recommended for use with young high school gymnasts.",

keywords = "Bioelectrical impedance analysis, Body composition, Cross-validation, Underwater weighing",

author = "Eckerson, {Joan M.} and Evetovich, {Tammy K.} and Stout, {Jeffrey R.} and Housh, {Terry J.} and Johnson, {Glen O.} and Housh, {Dona J.} and Ebersole, {Kyle T.} and Smith, {Douglas B.}",

year = "1997",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1097/00005768-199707000-00017",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "29",

pages = "962--968",

journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",

issn = "0195-9131",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of bioelectrical impedance equations for estimating fat-free weight in high school female gymnasts

AU - Eckerson, Joan M.

AU - Evetovich, Tammy K.

AU - Stout, Jeffrey R.

AU - Housh, Terry J.

AU - Johnson, Glen O.

AU - Housh, Dona J.

AU - Ebersole, Kyle T.

AU - Smith, Douglas B.

PY - 1997/7

Y1 - 1997/7

N2 - The present study examined the validity of bioelectrical impedance (BIA) equations for estimating fat-free weight (FFW) in female gymnasts by comparing the values to those obtained from underwater weighing (UWW). Ninety-seven female Caucasian high school gymnasts (X age ± SD = 15.7 ± 1.1 yr) participated in the study. FFW from UWW was calculated from percent fat using the revised formula of Brozek et al. (5 (X FFW ± SD = 43.8 ± 4.5 kg) and the age-specific constants of Lohman (28) (X FFW ± SD = 44.8 ± 4.6 kg). Cross-validation analyses included examination of the constant error (CE), SEE, r, and total error (TE). The results indicated similar trends between equations when based on either the Brozek or Lohman conversions; however, the CE, SEE, and TE values were consistently lower for the majority of the equations using the revised formula of Brozek et al. (5). Based upon the results of the cross-validation analyses, the equation of Houtkooper et al. (22) and the interlaboratory equations of Van Loan et al. (50) and Lohman (29), which resulted in identical TE values of 2.4 kg are recommended for use with young high school gymnasts.

AB - The present study examined the validity of bioelectrical impedance (BIA) equations for estimating fat-free weight (FFW) in female gymnasts by comparing the values to those obtained from underwater weighing (UWW). Ninety-seven female Caucasian high school gymnasts (X age ± SD = 15.7 ± 1.1 yr) participated in the study. FFW from UWW was calculated from percent fat using the revised formula of Brozek et al. (5 (X FFW ± SD = 43.8 ± 4.5 kg) and the age-specific constants of Lohman (28) (X FFW ± SD = 44.8 ± 4.6 kg). Cross-validation analyses included examination of the constant error (CE), SEE, r, and total error (TE). The results indicated similar trends between equations when based on either the Brozek or Lohman conversions; however, the CE, SEE, and TE values were consistently lower for the majority of the equations using the revised formula of Brozek et al. (5). Based upon the results of the cross-validation analyses, the equation of Houtkooper et al. (22) and the interlaboratory equations of Van Loan et al. (50) and Lohman (29), which resulted in identical TE values of 2.4 kg are recommended for use with young high school gymnasts.

KW - Bioelectrical impedance analysis

KW - Body composition

KW - Cross-validation

KW - Underwater weighing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030612518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030612518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005768-199707000-00017

DO - 10.1097/00005768-199707000-00017

M3 - Article

C2 - 9243497

AN - SCOPUS:0030612518

VL - 29

SP - 962

EP - 968

JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - 7

ER -