TY - JOUR
T1 - Variations in Costs of a Collaborative Care Model for Dementia
AU - Rosa, Talita D.
AU - Possin, Katherine L.
AU - Bernstein, Alissa
AU - Merrilees, Jennifer
AU - Dulaney, Sarah
AU - Matuoka, Jessica
AU - Lee, Kirby P.
AU - Chiong, Winston
AU - Bonasera, Stephen J.
AU - Harrison, Krista L.
AU - Kahn, James G.
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial Disclosure: This project was funded by the Global Brain Health Institute, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (1C1CMS331346), the National Institute on Aging (5R01A G056715), and the National Institute on Neurological Disorders and Stroke (UG3 NS105557). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or any of its agencies.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The American Geriatrics Society
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES: Care coordination programs can improve patient outcomes and decrease healthcare expenditures; however, implementation costs are poorly understood. We evaluate the direct costs of implementing a collaborative dementia care program. DESIGN: We applied a micro-costing analysis to calculate operational costs per-participant-month between March 2015 and May 2017. SETTING: The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC). PARTICIPANTS: Participants diagnosed with dementia, enrolled in Medicare or Medicaid, 45 years of age or older, residents of California, Nebraska or Iowa, and having a caregiver. The sample was 272 (UCSF) and 192 (UNMC) participants. INTERVENTION: A collaborative dementia care program provided by care team navigators (CTNs), advanced practice nurses, a social worker, and a pharmacist, focusing on caregiver support and education, medications, advance care planning, and behavior symptom management. MEASUREMENTS: We measured costs (personnel, supplies, equipment, and training costs) during three program periods, Start-up, Early Operations, and Continuing Operations, and estimated the effects of caseload variation on costs. RESULTS: Start-up and Early Operations costs were, respectively, $581 and $328 (California), and $501 and $219 (Nebraska) per-participant-month. Average costs decreased across phases to $241 (California) and $142 (Nebraska) per-participant-month during Continuing Operations. We estimated that costs would range between $75 (UNMC) and $92 (UCSF) per-participant-month with the highest projected caseloads (90). CONCLUSION: We found that CTN caseload is an important driver of service cost. We provide strategies for maximizing caseload without sacrificing quality of care. We also discuss current barriers to broad implementation that can inform new reimbursement policies. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2628–2633, 2019.
AB - OBJECTIVES: Care coordination programs can improve patient outcomes and decrease healthcare expenditures; however, implementation costs are poorly understood. We evaluate the direct costs of implementing a collaborative dementia care program. DESIGN: We applied a micro-costing analysis to calculate operational costs per-participant-month between March 2015 and May 2017. SETTING: The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC). PARTICIPANTS: Participants diagnosed with dementia, enrolled in Medicare or Medicaid, 45 years of age or older, residents of California, Nebraska or Iowa, and having a caregiver. The sample was 272 (UCSF) and 192 (UNMC) participants. INTERVENTION: A collaborative dementia care program provided by care team navigators (CTNs), advanced practice nurses, a social worker, and a pharmacist, focusing on caregiver support and education, medications, advance care planning, and behavior symptom management. MEASUREMENTS: We measured costs (personnel, supplies, equipment, and training costs) during three program periods, Start-up, Early Operations, and Continuing Operations, and estimated the effects of caseload variation on costs. RESULTS: Start-up and Early Operations costs were, respectively, $581 and $328 (California), and $501 and $219 (Nebraska) per-participant-month. Average costs decreased across phases to $241 (California) and $142 (Nebraska) per-participant-month during Continuing Operations. We estimated that costs would range between $75 (UNMC) and $92 (UCSF) per-participant-month with the highest projected caseloads (90). CONCLUSION: We found that CTN caseload is an important driver of service cost. We provide strategies for maximizing caseload without sacrificing quality of care. We also discuss current barriers to broad implementation that can inform new reimbursement policies. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2628–2633, 2019.
KW - care navigation
KW - collaborative dementia care
KW - cost analysis
KW - dementia care coordination
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069890936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069890936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jgs.16076
DO - 10.1111/jgs.16076
M3 - Article
C2 - 31317539
AN - SCOPUS:85069890936
SN - 0002-8614
VL - 67
SP - 2628
EP - 2633
JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
IS - 12
ER -