TY - JOUR
T1 - Victimization experiences and adolescent substance use
T2 - Does the type and degree of victimization matter?
AU - Pinchevsky, Gillian M.
AU - Fagan, Abigail A.
AU - Wright, Emily M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by grant R01DA30387-01 from the National Institute of Drug Abuse. The National Institute of Drug Abuse bears no responsibility for the conclusions presented here.
PY - 2014/1
Y1 - 2014/1
N2 - Evidence indicates an association between victimization and adolescent substance use, but the exact nature of this relationship remains unclear. Some research focuses solely on the consequences of experiencing indirect victimization (e.g., witnessing violence), others examine direct victimization (e.g., being personally victimized), and still others combine both forms of victimization without assessing the relative impact of each on substance use. Furthermore, many of these studies only assess these relationships in the short-term using cross-sectional data. This study uses data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) to explore the impact of experiencing only indirect victimization, only direct victimization, both forms of victimization, and no victimization on substance use at two time points during adolescence. We find that of those adolescents who are victimized, the majority experience indirect victimization only, followed by experiencing both forms of victimization, and experiencing directvictimization only. Each of the victimization experiences were associated with increased contemporaneous substance use, with the strongest effects for those experiencing multiple forms of violence. For all victims, however, the impact on substance use declined over time.
AB - Evidence indicates an association between victimization and adolescent substance use, but the exact nature of this relationship remains unclear. Some research focuses solely on the consequences of experiencing indirect victimization (e.g., witnessing violence), others examine direct victimization (e.g., being personally victimized), and still others combine both forms of victimization without assessing the relative impact of each on substance use. Furthermore, many of these studies only assess these relationships in the short-term using cross-sectional data. This study uses data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) to explore the impact of experiencing only indirect victimization, only direct victimization, both forms of victimization, and no victimization on substance use at two time points during adolescence. We find that of those adolescents who are victimized, the majority experience indirect victimization only, followed by experiencing both forms of victimization, and experiencing directvictimization only. Each of the victimization experiences were associated with increased contemporaneous substance use, with the strongest effects for those experiencing multiple forms of violence. For all victims, however, the impact on substance use declined over time.
KW - Adolescents
KW - Community violence
KW - Substance use
KW - Victimization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899549723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899549723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0886260513505150
DO - 10.1177/0886260513505150
M3 - Article
C2 - 24144722
AN - SCOPUS:84899549723
SN - 0886-2605
VL - 29
SP - 299
EP - 319
JO - Journal of Interpersonal Violence
JF - Journal of Interpersonal Violence
IS - 2
ER -