Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this research was to determine test intervals between intraoperator case reviews to minimize the impact of recall. Methods: Three pathologists were presented with a group of 120 slides and subsequently challenged with a study set of 120 slides after 2-week and 4-week intervals. The challenge set consisted of 60 slides seen during the initial review and 60 slides previously unseen within the study. Pathologists rendered a diagnosis for each slide and indicated whether they recalled seeing the slide previously (yes/no). Results: Two weeks after having been shown 60 cases from a challenge set of 120 cases, the pathologists correctly remembered 26, 22, and 24 cases or 40% overall. After 4 weeks, the pathologists correctly recalled 31% of cases previously seen. Conclusions: Pathologists were capable of recalling from memory cases seen previously at 2 and 4 weeks. Recall rates may be sufficiently high to affect intraobserver study design.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 412-418 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | American journal of clinical pathology |
Volume | 143 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2015 |
Keywords
- Basic science
- Education
- Informatics
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine