TY - JOUR
T1 - When what you see is what you get
T2 - The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men
AU - Gervais, Sarah J.
AU - Vescio, Theresa K.
AU - Allen, Jill
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article: This research was supported by the McClelland Fellowship awarded to the first author by HayGroup.
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - This research examined the effects of the objectifying gaze on math performance, interaction motivation, body surveillance, body shame, and body dissatisfaction. In an experiment, undergraduate participants (67 women and 83 men) received an objectifying gaze during an interaction with a trained confederate of the other sex. As hypothesized, the objectifying gaze caused decrements in women'smath performance but notmen's. Interestingly, the objectifying gaze also increased women's, but notmen's,motivation to engage in subsequent interactions with their partner. Finally, the objectifying gaze did not influence body surveillance, body shame, or body dissatisfaction forwomen or men. One explanation for themath performance and interaction motivation findings is stereotype threat. To the degree that the objectifying gaze arouses stereotype threat, math performance may decrease because it conveys that women's looks are valued over their other qualities. Furthermore, interaction motivation may increase because stereotype threat arouses belonging uncertainty or concerns about social connections. As a result, the objectifying gazemay trigger a vicious cycle in which women underperform but continue to interact with the people who led them to underperform in the first place. Implications for long-term consequences of the objectifying gaze and directions for future research are discussed.
AB - This research examined the effects of the objectifying gaze on math performance, interaction motivation, body surveillance, body shame, and body dissatisfaction. In an experiment, undergraduate participants (67 women and 83 men) received an objectifying gaze during an interaction with a trained confederate of the other sex. As hypothesized, the objectifying gaze caused decrements in women'smath performance but notmen's. Interestingly, the objectifying gaze also increased women's, but notmen's,motivation to engage in subsequent interactions with their partner. Finally, the objectifying gaze did not influence body surveillance, body shame, or body dissatisfaction forwomen or men. One explanation for themath performance and interaction motivation findings is stereotype threat. To the degree that the objectifying gaze arouses stereotype threat, math performance may decrease because it conveys that women's looks are valued over their other qualities. Furthermore, interaction motivation may increase because stereotype threat arouses belonging uncertainty or concerns about social connections. As a result, the objectifying gazemay trigger a vicious cycle in which women underperform but continue to interact with the people who led them to underperform in the first place. Implications for long-term consequences of the objectifying gaze and directions for future research are discussed.
KW - Body image
KW - Human sex differences
KW - Interpersonal interaction
KW - Mathematics anxiety
KW - Motivation
KW - Objectification
KW - Sexism
KW - Stereotype threat
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955460492&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955460492&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0361684310386121
DO - 10.1177/0361684310386121
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79955460492
SN - 0361-6843
VL - 35
SP - 5
EP - 17
JO - Psychology of Women Quarterly
JF - Psychology of Women Quarterly
IS - 1
ER -