TY - JOUR
T1 - Written content indicators of problematic approach behavior toward political officials
AU - Schoeneman, Katherine A.
AU - Scalora, Mario J.
AU - Darrow, Charles D.
AU - Mclawsen, Julia E.
AU - Chang, Grace H.
AU - Zimmerman, William J.
PY - 2011/3
Y1 - 2011/3
N2 - Those charged with assessing and managing threatening communications must utilize risk factors that are behavioral, operational, and reasonably attainable during investigations. This project examined 326 written correspondence cases of an inappropriate, disruptive, or threatening nature that targeted political officials, with the specific goal of identifying written content indicators of problematic approach behavior. Results revealed that subjects who engaged in problematic approach activity toward their targets had more criminal history, past threat assessment activity, familiarity with firearms, past substance use, and indicators of serious mental illness. Approachers were more likely to engage in multiple contact methods, target dispersion, more overall contacts, and prior contact with their target. Numerous content themes were associated with future problematic approach, including longer handwritten correspondence, referencing specific events, making demands, mentioning stressors, focus on personal themes, feeling their rights were violated, and expressing an intention to approach. Harassing, insulting, and threatening language was not related to approach behavior. The implications of these findings are wide-ranging for the practice of threat assessment.
AB - Those charged with assessing and managing threatening communications must utilize risk factors that are behavioral, operational, and reasonably attainable during investigations. This project examined 326 written correspondence cases of an inappropriate, disruptive, or threatening nature that targeted political officials, with the specific goal of identifying written content indicators of problematic approach behavior. Results revealed that subjects who engaged in problematic approach activity toward their targets had more criminal history, past threat assessment activity, familiarity with firearms, past substance use, and indicators of serious mental illness. Approachers were more likely to engage in multiple contact methods, target dispersion, more overall contacts, and prior contact with their target. Numerous content themes were associated with future problematic approach, including longer handwritten correspondence, referencing specific events, making demands, mentioning stressors, focus on personal themes, feeling their rights were violated, and expressing an intention to approach. Harassing, insulting, and threatening language was not related to approach behavior. The implications of these findings are wide-ranging for the practice of threat assessment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953031272&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953031272&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/bsl.977
DO - 10.1002/bsl.977
M3 - Article
C2 - 21351136
AN - SCOPUS:79953031272
SN - 0735-3936
VL - 29
SP - 284
EP - 301
JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law
JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law
IS - 2
ER -